Snapdragon 690 vs Snapdragon 765 Comparison
 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | |
|---|---|---|
|
Total: 14.2 Ghz 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77) 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
Total GHZ
High CPU clock ghz is high speed |
Total: 15.3 Ghz %7.7 more speed
1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76) 1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76) 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
|
8 |
Total Core more CPU cores more power! |
8 |
|
2000 Mhz
|
Frequency
higher is better |
2300 Mhz
%15.0 more |
|
Arm V8.2 newer version |
Architecture
Newest version is better |
Arm V8.0
|
|
8 Nanometer
|
Transistor Size
smaller is better |
7 Nanometer
↓ %14.3 |
| Adreno 619L | GPU Name | Adreno 620 |
|
2133 Mhz
+ %241.3 |
GPU Frequency
higher is better |
625 Mhz
|
|
128
|
Arithmetic logic unit
higher is better |
192
+ %50.0 |
|
1.1
|
Vulkan Version
newer is better |
1.1
|
|
2.0
|
Opencl Version
newer is better |
2.0
|
|
12
|
Directx Version
newer is better |
12
|
|
LPDDR4X
|
Memory Type
newer ram type is better |
LPDDR4X
|
|
2133 Mhz
|
Memory Frequency
higher is better |
2133 Mhz
|
|
14.9 GB/s
|
Memory Bandwith
higher is better |
17 GB/s
+ %14.1 |
|
8 GB
|
Memory Capacity
higher is better |
12 GB
+ %50.0 |
|
Yes |
A.I. CPU
It is advantageous to have artificial intelligence chip. |
Yes
|
|
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
|
Storage
higher is better |
eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0
|
|
2520 x 1080
|
Screen Resolution
higher is better |
3200 x 1800
+ %27.0 |
|
1x 192MP, 2x 16MP
|
Cameras
More camera and higher pixel is better |
1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
+ %5.4 |
|
4K at 30FPS
|
Video Record
Higher video resulotion and higher fps is better |
4K at 30FPS
|
|
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
|
Codec Support
more codec support is betterr |
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
|
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Sound Codecs
more codec support is better |
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
| X51 | Modem Chip | X52 |
|
LTE Cat. 18
|
4G class
Higher class is better for 4g speed |
LTE Cat. 24
+ %33.3 |
|
Yes
|
5g Support
5G support is important for high speed data |
Yes
|
|
1200 Mbps
|
Download Speed
Higher is better |
1200 Mbps
|
|
200 Mbps
|
Upload Speed
Higher is better |
210 Mbps
+ %5.0 |
|
6
|
Wifi Version
Higher is better |
6
|
|
5.1
+ newer |
Bluetooth Version
Higher is better |
5.0
|
|
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
+ %16.7 |
GPS
more satellites, higher accuracy |
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
|
|
June 2020
+ newer |
Release
newer date may contain newer technologies. |
December 2019
|
|
628
+ %30.0 |
Geekbench5 Single Benchmark
Higher geekbench single score, higher single core processing power |
483
|
|
1809
|
Geekbench5 Multi Benchmark
Higher geekbench multiscore, higher multi-core processing power |
1809
|
|
323076
+ %12.2 |
Antutu 8 Benchmark
higher score is faster |
287908
|
Compare with other mobile platforms
- Snapdragon 690 vs Snapdragon 732G
- Snapdragon 690 vs A11 Bionic
- Snapdragon 690 vs Snapdragon 765
- Snapdragon 690 vs Dimensity 800
- Snapdragon 690 vs Dimensity 800U
- Snapdragon 690 vs Snapdragon 750G
- Snapdragon 690 vs Kirin 810
- Snapdragon 690 vs Snapdragon 765G
- Snapdragon 690 vs Exynos 980
- Snapdragon 690 vs Exynos 9810
- Snapdragon 765 vs Snapdragon 720G
- Snapdragon 765 vs Snapdragon 835
- Snapdragon 765 vs Exynos 880
- Snapdragon 765 vs Snapdragon 732G
- Snapdragon 765 vs A11 Bionic
- Snapdragon 765 vs Dimensity 800
- Snapdragon 765 vs Dimensity 800U
- Snapdragon 765 vs Snapdragon 690
- Snapdragon 765 vs Snapdragon 750G
- Snapdragon 765 vs Kirin 810